Hadith Rejectors

“If anyone disobeys Allah and His Messenger he is indeed on a clearly wrong path.” [Al-Ahzab, 33:36]

“He that obeys Allah and His Messenger has already attained the great victory.” [Al-Ahzab, 33:71].

For the past fourteen centuries Qur’an and Sunnah have been the twin undisputed sources of Guidance for Muslims. In every generation, the Muslims devoted the best of their minds and talents to their study. They learned both the words and meanings of the Qur’an through the Prophet, Salla-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, and made an unprecedented effort in preserving them for the next generation. The result: The development of the marvelous — and unparalleled — science of hadith, one of the brightest aspects of Muslim history.

What does it mean to believe in a Prophet except to pledge to follow him? And so the teachings of the Prophet, Salla-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, have always guided this Ummah. No body, in his right mind, could or did question this practice. Then something happened. During the colonial period, when most of the Muslim world came under the subjugation of the West, some “scholars” arose in places like Egypt (Taha Hussein), India (Abdullah Chakralawi and Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz), and Turkey (Zia Gogelup), who began questioning the authenticity and relevance of hadith. It was not that some genius had found flaws in the hadith study that had eluded the entire ummah for thirteen centuries. It was simply that the pressures from the dominant Western civilization to conform were too strong for them to withstand. They buckled. Prophetic teachings and life example — Hadith — was the obstacle in this process and so it became the target.

Another factor helped them. Today most Muslims, including the vast majority of the western-educated Muslims, have meager knowledge of hadith, having spent no time in studying even the fundamentals of this vast subject. How many know the difference between Sahih and Hasan, or between Maudau and Dhaif? The certification process used in hadith transmission? Names of any hadith book produced in the first century of Hijrah, or the number of such books? A majority probably would not be able to name even the six principal hadith books (Sihah Sitta) or know anything about the history of their compilation. Obviously such atmosphere provides a fertile ground for sowing suspicions and doubts.

They call themselves as ahle-Qur’an or Quranists. This is misleading. For their distinction is not in affirming the Qur’an, but in rejecting the Hadith. The ideas of munkareen-e-hadith evolve into three mutually contradictory strains. The first holds that the job of the Prophet, Salla-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, was only to deliver the Qur’an. We are to follow only the Qur’an and nothing else, as were the Companions. Further, hadith is not needed to understand the Qur’an, which is sufficient for providing guidance. The second group holds that the Companions were required to follow the Prophet, Salla-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, but we are not. The third holds that, in theory, we also have to follow the hadith but we did not receive ahadith through authentic sources and therefore we have to reject all ahadith collections!

Internal contradictions are a hallmark of false ideologies. How can anyone hold the first position yet profess belief in Qur’an while it says: “And We have sent down unto You the Message so that you may explain clearly to men what is sent for them.” [An-Nahal, 16:44]. And this: “Allah did confer a great favor on the Believers when He sent among them a Messenger from among themselves, rehearsing unto them the Signs (Verses) of Allah, purifying them, instructing them in Scripture, and teaching them Wisdom. While before that they were in manifest error.” [A'ale Imran 3:164].

How can anyone hold the second position (limiting the Prophethood to 23 years) yet profess belief in Qur’an, while it says: “We did not send you except as Mercy for all creatures.” [Al-Anbia, 21:107] And, “We have not sent you except as a Messenger to all mankind, giving them glad tidings and warning them against sin.” [Saba, 34:28]

The third position seems to have avoided these obvious pitfalls, yet in reality it is no different. Consider statements 1, 4, and 7 in the summary of hadith rejecters’ claims. So hadith undermines Qur’an’s exclusivity, yet would have been followed blindly at the time of the Prophet, Salla-Allahu alayhi wa sallam. Ahadith cannot be followed because they are not reliable, yet can be followed for ritual prayers.

Here for the sake of our Muslim brothers and sisters to let them know about some popular names of Hadith Rejecters.

Main Hadith Rejectors from Past:

1 Sir Syed Ahmed Khan 1817-1898
2 Abdullah Chakralawi d: 1930
3 Ghulam Ahmed Parvez 1903-1985
4 Muhammad Asad (Leopold Weiss) 1900-1992
5 Hameed Uddin Farahi 1863-1930
6 Amin Ahsan Islahi 1904-1997
7 Habib-ur-Rahman Siddiqui Kandhalvi d:1975?
8 Chiragh Ali 1844-1895
9 Muhammad Abduh(Egypt) 1849-1905
10 Qasim Amin(Egypt) 1863-1908
11 Khwaja Altaf Hussain Hali 1837-1914
12 Muhammad Tawfiq Sidqi(Lebanon) 1881-1920
13 Sayyid Ameer Ali 1849-1928
14 Obaidullah Sindhi d:1944
15 Muhammad Aslam Jayrajpuri 1881-1955
16 Inayatullah Khan Mashriqi 1888-1963



Hadith Rejectors of the Present time:

1 Javed Ahmad Ghamidi 1951-
2 Dr. Shabbir Ahmed, M.D 1947-
3 Dr. Khalid Zaheer 1951-
4 Moiz Amjad 1962-
5 Abdus Sattar Ghauri 1935-
6 Muhammad Rafi Mufti 1953-
7 Talib Mohsin 1959-
8 Shehzad Saleem 1953-
9 Asif Iftikhar 1966-
10 Sajid Hameed(Sajid Shahbaz Khan) 1965-

http://www.hujra.net/index.php?action=printpage;topic=2614.0

http://www.themodernreligion.com/misc/cults/anti_muslim_hadithrejectors.html